%20x%20P(B)%7C%20%3D%20%7CP(A%20U%20B)%7C%20for%20Disjoint%20Sets%3A%20A%20Deep%20Dive)
Hey guys, let's dive into a cool problem in elementary set theory: proving that for disjoint sets A and B, the cardinality of the Cartesian product of their power sets, ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣, is equal to the cardinality of the power set of their union, ∣P(AextUB)∣. This might sound a bit technical with all those symbols, but stick with me, and we'll break it down piece by piece. We're going to check a proof and make sure it's solid. Remember, the cardinality of a set, denoted by ∣X∣, is just the number of elements in that set. The power set P(X) is the set of all possible subsets of X, including the empty set and X itself. When A and B are disjoint, it means they have no elements in common, i.e., Aext∩B=ext∅. This condition is super important and simplifies things quite a bit.
So, the goal is to show that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣. Let's recall what the Cartesian product P(A)imesP(B) means. It's the set of all ordered pairs (X,Y) where X is a subset of A (i.e., Xext∈P(A)) and Y is a subset of B (i.e., Yext∈P(B)). The cardinality of this set is ∣P(A)∣imes∣P(B)∣. Now, what about P(AextUB)? This is the set of all subsets of the union of A and B. If A and B are disjoint, then the union AextUB contains all elements from A and all elements from B, with no overlap. The cardinality of P(X) is 2∣X∣. So, if ∣A∣=m and ∣B∣=n, then ∣P(A)∣=2m and ∣P(B)∣=2n. Since A and B are disjoint, ∣AextUB∣=∣A∣+∣B∣=m+n. Therefore, ∣P(AextUB)∣=2m+n. Our task is to prove that 2mimes2n=2m+n, which is a fundamental property of exponents and holds true. The challenge here is to demonstrate this equality using set theory concepts, specifically by constructing a bijection (a one-to-one correspondence) between the two sets.
Let's consider the function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB) defined by f(pa​,pb​)=pa​extUpb​, where pa​ext∈P(A) and pb​ext∈P(B). To prove that the cardinalities are equal, we need to show that this function f is a bijection. A bijection means the function is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto). If we can prove f is a bijection, then by definition, the two sets must have the same number of elements, i.e., the same cardinality.
Understanding the Function and the Goal
Alright guys, let's get a clearer picture of what we're trying to achieve here. We want to prove that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣, given that A and B are disjoint sets. Remember, P(A) is the set of all subsets of A, and P(B) is the set of all subsets of B. The Cartesian product P(A)imesP(B) is the set of all possible pairs (X,Y) where X is any subset of A and Y is any subset of B. The cardinality of P(A)imesP(B) is simply ∣P(A)∣imes∣P(B)∣. On the other hand, P(AextUB) is the set of all subsets of the combined set AextUB. Since A and B are disjoint, their union AextUB contains all elements from A and all elements from B, without any overlap. The cardinality of P(AextUB) is 2∣AextUB∣.
Now, let's think about the function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB) defined by f(pa​,pb​)=pa​extUpb​. Here, pa​ is a subset of A, and pb​ is a subset of B. The function takes such a pair and returns their union. Since pa​ext⊆A and pb​ext⊆B, and A and B are disjoint, any element in pa​ is not in pb​, and vice versa. The union pa​extUpb​ is a set containing all elements from pa​ and all elements from pb​. Crucially, because A and B are disjoint, pa​extUpb​ will always be a subset of AextUB. Why? Because every element in pa​ is in A, and every element in pb​ is in B, so every element in their union must be in AextUB. This confirms that the output of our function f is indeed an element of P(AextUB).
To prove that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣, we need to demonstrate that f is a bijection. A bijection is a function that is both one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective). If we can show these two properties, it means that every element in P(A)imesP(B) maps to a unique element in P(AextUB), and every element in P(AextUB) is mapped to by exactly one element from P(A)imesP(B). This one-to-one correspondence is the key to proving that the two sets have the same number of elements (cardinality).
Let's get started with checking these properties. It's where the real proof lies, and it requires careful logical steps. We'll examine injectivity first, then surjectivity. If both hold, we've got our proof! This is a classic way to establish equality of cardinalities in set theory, and it's a fundamental concept that pops up in many areas of mathematics. So, let's roll up our sleeves and tackle these proofs. It's going to be awesome!
Proving Injectivity (One-to-One)
Alright team, let's prove that our function f(pa​,pb​)=pa​extUpb​ is injective. This means that if we have two different pairs from the domain, say (pa1​,pb1​) and (pa2​,pb2​), their images under f must also be different. Or, more formally, if f(pa1​,pb1​)=f(pa2​,pb2​), then it must be the case that (pa1​,pb1​)=(pa2​,pb2​). Let's start with the assumption that f(pa1​,pb1​)=f(pa2​,pb2​).
By the definition of f, this means:
pa1​extUpb1​=pa2​extUpb2​
Now, we need to show that this equality implies pa1​=pa2​ AND pb1​=pb2​. This is where the condition that A and B are disjoint is absolutely crucial. Since Aext∩B=ext∅, any element in A is not in B, and any element in B is not in A.
Let's consider an arbitrary element x that belongs to pa1​. Since pa1​ext⊆A, x must be an element of A. Because A and B are disjoint, x cannot be an element of B.
Now, since xext∈pa1​, it must also be an element of the union pa1​extUpb1​. We are given that pa1​extUpb1​=pa2​extUpb2​. Therefore, x must also be an element of pa2​extUpb2​.
Since xext∈A and A and B are disjoint, x cannot come from pb2​ (because pb2​ext⊆B). This leaves only one possibility: x must come from pa2​. So, we've shown that if xext∈pa1​, then xext∈pa2​. This implies that pa1​ext⊆pa2​.
We can perform a symmetric argument. Let y be an arbitrary element of pa2​. Since pa2​ext⊆A, yext∈A. Because A and B are disjoint, y cannot be in B. Since yext∈pa2​, it must be in pa2​extUpb2​. As pa2​extUpb2​=pa1​extUpb1​, y must be in pa1​extUpb1​. Since yext∈A and A and B are disjoint, y cannot come from pb1​ (because pb1​ext⊆B). Therefore, y must come from pa1​. This implies pa2​ext⊆pa1​.
Combining both results (pa1​ext⊆pa2​ and pa2​ext⊆pa1​), we conclude that $ extbf{p_{a1} = p_{a2}}$.
Now, let's do the same for the subsets of B. Consider an arbitrary element z that belongs to pb1​. Since pb1​ext⊆B, z must be an element of B. Because A and B are disjoint, z cannot be an element of A.
Since zext∈pb1​, it must also be an element of the union pa1​extUpb1​. We know pa1​extUpb1​=pa2​extUpb2​. Therefore, z must also be an element of pa2​extUpb2​.
Because zext∈B and A and B are disjoint, z cannot come from pa2​ (since pa2​ext⊆A). This leaves only one possibility: z must come from pb2​. So, we've shown that if zext∈pb1​, then zext∈pb2​. This implies that pb1​ext⊆pb2​.
Similarly, let w be an arbitrary element of pb2​. Since pb2​ext⊆B, wext∈B. Because A and B are disjoint, w cannot be in A. Since wext∈pb2​, it must be in pa2​extUpb2​. As pa2​extUpb2​=pa1​extUpb1​, w must be in pa1​extUpb1​. Since wext∈B and A and B are disjoint, w cannot come from pa1​ (since pa1​ext⊆A). Therefore, w must come from pb1​. This implies pb2​ext⊆pb1​.
Combining these results (pb1​ext⊆pb2​ and pb2​ext⊆pb1​), we conclude that $ extbf{p_{b1} = p_{b2}}$.
Since we have shown that pa1​=pa2​ and pb1​=pb2​, it follows that (pa1​,pb1​)=(pa2​,pb2​). This completes the proof of injectivity. Our function f maps distinct pairs to distinct pairs, which is exactly what we needed!
Proving Surjectivity (Onto)
Now, let's tackle the second part: proving that our function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB) defined by f(pa​,pb​)=pa​extUpb​ is surjective. For f to be surjective, it means that for every element in the codomain, P(AextUB), there must be at least one element in the domain, P(A)imesP(B), that maps to it. In simpler terms, any subset of AextUB can be formed by taking the union of some subset of A and some subset of B. Let's grab an arbitrary element S from the codomain, P(AextUB). This means S is a subset of AextUB, so Sext⊆AextUB. Our goal is to find a pair (pa​,pb​) where pa​ext∈P(A) and pb​ext∈P(B) such that f(pa​,pb​)=S, which means pa​extUpb​=S.
Since Sext⊆AextUB, we can split S into two parts: the elements of S that are also in A, and the elements of S that are also in B. Let's define:
pa​=Sext∩A
pb​=Sext∩B
Now, we need to verify a few things about these newly defined sets pa​ and pb​. First, are they indeed elements of the domain sets? That is, is pa​ext∈P(A) and pb​ext∈P(B)?
Since pa​=Sext∩A, and Sext⊆AextUB, any element in pa​ must be in both S and A. If an element is in A, it's certainly a subset of A. So, pa​ext⊆A. This means $ extbf{p_a ∈ P(A)}$.
Similarly, since pb​=Sext∩B, any element in pb​ must be in both S and B. If an element is in B, it's certainly a subset of B. So, pb​ext⊆B. This means $ extbf{p_b ∈ P(B)}$.
Great! We've found a pair (pa​,pb​) from the domain P(A)imesP(B). Now, we need to check if their union is equal to our arbitrary set S. That is, does pa​extUpb​=S?
Let's consider the union pa​extUpb​=(Sext∩A)extU(Sext∩B).
We know that for any sets X,Y,Z, the distributive property of intersection over union holds: Xext∩(YextUZ)=(Xext∩Y)extU(Xext∩Z). A similar distributive property holds for union over intersection, but it's not directly applicable here. However, we can use the property that for any sets S,A,B, (Sext∩A)extU(Sext∩B)=Sext∩(AextUB).
So, pa​extUpb​=Sext∩(AextUB).
Since S is an element of P(AextUB), we know that Sext⊆AextUB. When a set S is a subset of another set U, the intersection Sext∩U is simply S. In our case, Sext⊆AextUB, so Sext∩(AextUB)=S.
Therefore, we have shown that $ extbf{p_a ext{ U } p_b = S}$.
This means that for any subset S in P(AextUB), we have found a pair (pa​,pb​)ext∈P(A)imesP(B) such that f(pa​,pb​)=S. This is precisely the definition of surjectivity. We've successfully shown that our function f is surjective!
Conclusion: A Bijection is Born!
So, what does this all mean, guys? We started with the goal of proving that ∣P(A)imesP(B)∣=∣P(AextUB)∣ for disjoint sets A and B. We defined a function f:P(A)imesP(B)oP(AextUB) by f(pa​,pb​)=pa​extUpb​. We then meticulously proved two crucial properties about this function:
- Injectivity (One-to-One): We showed that if f(pa1​,pb1​)=f(pa2​,pb2​), then it must follow that pa1​=pa2​ and pb1​=pb2​. This ensures that each distinct pair in the domain maps to a distinct subset in the codomain.
- Surjectivity (Onto): We showed that for any subset S in P(AextUB), we can find specific subsets pa​ext∈P(A) and pb​ext∈P(B) (namely, pa​=Sext∩A and pb​=Sext∩B) such that their union pa​extUpb​ equals S. This confirms that every possible subset of AextUB is