App Navigation Bug: 'Quit?' Popup Issue

Oct 31, 2025 by SLV Team 40 views

Hey guys! Let's dive into a quirky bug report we've got here concerning a milk delivery app. It's all about how the app handles navigation, specifically when a user tries to go back from the discovery screen. Stick around, and we'll break down the issue, how to reproduce it, what the expected behavior should be, and all the technical nitty-gritty.

Describing the Navigation Bug

So, here's the deal: the main issue revolves around the "Quit?" popup in the app. Imagine you're browsing through the discovery screen, checking out all the cool milk options. Now, you decide to go back. Instead of the "Quit?" popup appearing immediately, you're first taken to the zones screen, and then the popup shows up. That's not quite right, is it? The expected behavior is for the "Quit?" popup to appear as soon as you try to exit the discovery screen, making the navigation smoother and more intuitive for the user.

The core of the problem lies in the sequence of events. The app is navigating back to the zones screen before prompting the user to quit. This creates an extra, unnecessary step in the user's journey. We want to streamline this process, ensuring the popup appears directly when the user initiates the back action from the discovery screen. This improvement not only enhances user experience but also aligns with standard mobile app navigation patterns.

Why is this important? Well, think about it from a user's perspective. Every extra step, every unexpected screen transition, adds friction. In a world where user attention spans are shrinking, we need to make apps as seamless and straightforward as possible. By fixing this bug, we're not just addressing a technical glitch; we're optimizing the user experience, making the app more enjoyable and efficient to use. This ultimately leads to happier users who are more likely to keep using the app.

Moreover, this issue could be indicative of deeper architectural problems within the app's navigation system. By addressing it, we're not only resolving the immediate bug but also potentially uncovering and mitigating other underlying issues. This proactive approach to bug fixing ensures the long-term stability and reliability of the application.

How to Reproduce the Bug

Want to see this bug in action? No problem! Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to reproduce it:

Go to the 'discovery screen': Fire up the milk delivery app and navigate to the discovery section. This is where you'd typically browse different products or offers.
Scroll back to 'go back': Now, try to go back from the discovery screen. This might involve swiping, tapping a back button, or using your device's back gesture.
See error: Instead of the "Quit?" popup appearing immediately, you'll first be taken to the zones screen, and then the popup will show up.

This simple reproduction process highlights the ease with which users can encounter this bug. It’s not a rare, edge-case scenario; it's a common navigation flow that many users will experience. This makes it even more critical to address the issue promptly.

The key to effective bug reproduction is consistency. By following these steps, anyone should be able to consistently trigger the bug, allowing developers and testers to verify the fix once it's implemented. This reproducibility is essential for ensuring the bug is properly addressed and doesn't resurface in future updates.

Think of this process as a mini-investigation. We're not just reporting a bug; we're providing a clear and repeatable method for others to witness it firsthand. This collaborative approach to bug reporting and fixing is what makes software development a team effort. The more information we can provide, the easier it is for developers to understand and resolve the issue.

Expected Behavior

Okay, so we know what's happening, but what should happen? The expected behavior is pretty straightforward: when a user swipes back from the discovery screen, the system should immediately display the "Quit?" popup. No detours, no extra screens – just the popup, asking if you want to exit.

This direct interaction streamlines the user experience, making the app feel more responsive and intuitive. It aligns with standard navigation patterns in mobile apps, where back actions typically lead to an immediate confirmation or action prompt.

Imagine the difference this makes to the user. Instead of being momentarily disoriented by the zones screen appearing unexpectedly, they're greeted with a clear and concise question: “Do you want to quit?” This provides a sense of control and clarity, which are crucial for a positive user experience.

Moreover, this expected behavior reinforces the app's overall usability. Users develop a mental model of how the app should function, and consistency in navigation is a key component of this model. By adhering to this expected behavior, we're reinforcing the user's understanding of the app and making it easier for them to use.

This also reduces the cognitive load on the user. They don't have to process an unexpected screen transition before deciding whether to quit. The "Quit?" popup appears directly, allowing them to make a quick and informed decision. This efficiency is especially important in mobile apps, where users often have limited time and attention.

Visual Evidence: Screenshots and Screen Recording

To really drive the point home, the bug report includes a screen recording (Screen_Recording_20250120_162843.mp4) that visually demonstrates the issue. Seeing is believing, right? A video provides concrete evidence of the bug's behavior, making it crystal clear to developers what needs fixing.

The inclusion of visual aids is a best practice in bug reporting. Screenshots and screen recordings can capture nuances that written descriptions might miss. They provide a shared understanding of the problem, ensuring everyone is on the same page.

Imagine trying to describe this bug without the screen recording. You could explain the steps, but it's much harder to convey the jarring effect of the zones screen appearing unexpectedly. The video removes any ambiguity, leaving no room for misinterpretation.

This also speeds up the debugging process. Developers can quickly see the bug in action, allowing them to focus on identifying the root cause rather than trying to recreate the issue from a written description. This efficiency is crucial in fast-paced development cycles.

Furthermore, the screen recording serves as a valuable record of the bug's behavior. It can be used for future reference, helping to prevent similar issues from arising in other parts of the app. This proactive approach to quality assurance ensures the long-term stability of the application.

Technical Details: Device and Environment

Now, let's get into the technical details. The bug report specifies the environments where this issue was observed, which is crucial for developers to understand the scope of the problem.

Desktop Information:

OS: Not specified (e.g., iOS)
Browser: Not specified (e.g., Chrome, Safari)
Version: Not specified (e.g., 22)

Smartphone Information:

Device: Not specified (e.g., iPhone 6)
OS: Not specified (e.g., iOS 8.1)
Browser: Not specified (e.g., stock browser, Safari)
Version: Not specified (e.g., 22)

Notice that some information is missing, marked as "Not specified". This highlights the importance of providing complete information in bug reports. The more context developers have, the easier it is for them to diagnose and fix the issue.

Why is this information important? Different operating systems, browsers, and devices can behave differently. A bug that appears on one device might not appear on another. By knowing the specific environment where the bug was observed, developers can narrow down the potential causes.

For example, a bug might be specific to a particular version of iOS or a certain browser. Knowing this allows developers to focus their debugging efforts on the relevant code and libraries. It also helps them prioritize fixes based on the number of affected users.

In future bug reports, it's essential to fill in these missing details. The more comprehensive the information, the more efficient the debugging process will be.

Additional Context

Finally, the bug report includes an "Additional context" section. This is a space to add any extra information that might be relevant to the bug. It's like the cherry on top, providing developers with a deeper understanding of the issue.

This section is crucial for capturing nuances that might not fit into the standard bug report fields. It's a place to provide insights, observations, or even potential solutions.

For example, the additional context might include information about the user's network connection, other apps running in the background, or any specific actions that preceded the bug. This extra information can be invaluable in diagnosing complex issues.

Think of it as a detective adding notes to a case file. Every detail, no matter how small, could be a clue that helps solve the mystery. The additional context section is where these clues are recorded.

In this specific case, the additional context is left blank, but it's a reminder of the importance of this section. When reporting bugs, always think about what extra information you can provide to help developers understand and fix the issue.

So, there you have it! A detailed breakdown of a navigation bug in a milk delivery app. By understanding the bug, how to reproduce it, the expected behavior, and the technical details, we can work together to make the app even better. Remember, clear and comprehensive bug reports are the key to efficient debugging and a smoother user experience. Keep those reports coming, guys!